By Simon Spichak, MSc |
January 17th, 2022
It seems like, following the FDA’s controversial July 2021 approval of Biogen’s Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm, everyone is mad at someone. Here are the main reasons why.
The Alzheimer’s Association:
- Helped assemble a 2018 consortium that led to a biomarker-based definition of Alzheimer’s, controversial because most neurological diseases are still diagnosed through symptoms.
- Lobbied the FDA to approve Aduhelm, even though the trials did not reliably show that the drug reduced cognitive impairment.
- Called the CMS decision discriminatory because it limits access for marginalized groups. Critics say this feels contradictory, considering the organization lobbied for Aduhelm’s approval despite that its clinical trials lacked racial diversity.
Aduhelm’s drugmaker, Biogen:
- Has not included a diverse population in Aduhelm clinical trials even though Hispanic and African American populations are at a higher risk. It is also unclear whether the drug works similarly in these populations.
- Started Project Onyx to lobby the FDA and receive approval for Aduhelm despite cloudy efficacy data.
- Had back-channel meetings with the FDA that have triggered a congressional investigation.
- Initially marketed Adulem at $56,000 — much higher than the fair price estimated by an independent third party.
- Slashed the drug’s price in half amid poor sales and rejection by regulating agencies in Europe and Japan.
- Internal strife at the company following Aduhelm’s approval.
The Food and Drug Administration:
- Originally approved Aduhelm as a broad-label treatment even though it had been tested in mild Alzheimer’s. The FDA later walked back the broad-label.
- Had back-channel meetings with Biogen that have triggered a congressional investigation after the backlash from the public, scientists and even the-then chief of the FDA, Janet Woodcock.
- Approved Aduhelm with accelerated approval despite objections from biostatisticians and an expert panel.
- Three members of the advisory panel resigned in protest of the approval.
- Approval was based on biomarkers rather than differences in cognitive impairment. For drugs passing through the accelerated approval pathway, this is allowed as long as these outcomes can predict a real clinical benefit. However, it is debatable whether clearing amyloid actually slows the rate of cognitive decline.
- Contradicted in its Aduhelm approval decision by subsequent rejections from European and Japanese regulators.
- Initially waffled about whether it would cover Aduhelm, leaving patients and families in limbo.
- Increased the price of Medicare premiums for all subscribers — blaming Aduhelm costs, despite very low Aduhelm sales — before ultimately announcing its decision to dramatically limit coverage of the drug.
- Announced plans to only cover Aduhelm for people enrolled in a CMS-approved clinical trial of the drug’s efficacy, despite that Biogen is already running such a trial.
- Undermined the authority of the FDA in announcing its own make-or-break vetting process for Aduhelm and all other Alzheimer’s monoclonal anti-amyloid therapies to follow.
If you find our articles and interviews helpful, please consider becoming a supporting member of our community.
Frustrated by the lack of an editorially independent source of information on brain health and Alzheimer’s disease, we decided to create Being Patient.
We are a team of dedicated journalists covering the latest research on Alzheimer’s, bringing you access to the experts and elevating the patient perspective on what it’s like to live with dementia.
Please help support our mission.